Q. If a table is updated by a recurring job but never read, does it take up space on the hard disk?
A. Not anymore.
Monday, December 3, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This blog won "Best New Useless Blog Of The Year" for the past 2 years in a row!
2 comments:
Yes it surely takes up disk space to function the recurring job.
Related question:
If a replicated database is too expensive to maintain because the replication creates too much load, will replication be turned off when the application no longer uses the replicated database?
Post a Comment